Question: a) Why are both real and personal defenses valid against a holder; but only real defenses are valid against a holder in due course? What

a) Why are both real and personal defenses valid against a holder; but only real defenses are valid against a holder in due course? What is the difference between real and personal defenses?
b) In the discussion of personal defenses in the text (p.547), why is Ross a "mere holder," and not a holder in due course?

Step by Step Solution

3.49 Rating (169 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

a Real defenses deal with fundamental challenges to the basic validity o... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

842-L-B-L-L-E (4308).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!