a. Why would Kashin care if Kent was acting within his scope of employment? b. Was Kent

Question:

a. Why would Kashin care if Kent was acting within his scope of employment?
b. Was Kent driving to or from work when the accident happened?
c. Was he involved in any diplomatic activity at the time of the accident?
d. Why was Kent at the gym?
e. Was he going to do any more work that day?
f. Who leased his apartment?
g. Was he acting within the scope of employment?
Douglas Kent was the Consul General of the United States in Vladivostok, Russia. One evening, he drove from his office to a gym and then home. On the way home, he was involved in an accident that left Aleksandr Kashin severely injured. Kashin sued the United States government, claiming that Kent was within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Business Law and the Legal Environment

ISBN: 978-1285860381

7th edition

Authors: Susan S. Samuelson, Jeffrey F. Beatty

Question Posted: