Attorneys representing a group of male buyers employed by Flirty Fashions are filing a reverse discrimination suit

Question:

Attorneys representing a group of male buyers employed by Flirty Fashions are filing a reverse discrimination suit against the female-owned company. Central to their case are the following data, showing the relationship between years of service and annual salary for the firm€™s fourteen buyers, six of whom are men. The plaintiffs claim that the difference in slopes (0.606 for men versus 1.07 for women) is prima facie evidence that the company€™s salary policies discriminate against men. As the lawyer for Flirty Fashions, how would you respond? Use the following sums:
Attorneys representing a group of male buyers employed by Flirty

And

Attorneys representing a group of male buyers employed by Flirty
Attorneys representing a group of male buyers employed by Flirty
Attorneys representing a group of male buyers employed by Flirty
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: