Barbara Whitley had great expectations about her future as she sat at her graduation ceremony in May 2011. She was about to receive her Master of Accountancy degree, and the following week she would begin her career on the audit staff of Green, Thresher & Co., a public accounting firm. Things looked a little different to Barbara in February 2012. She was working on the audit of Delancey Fabrics Ltd., a textile manufacturer with a calendar year end. The pressure was enormous. Everyone on the audit team was putting in 70-hour weeks, and it still looked as if the audit would not be done on time. Barbara was doing work in the property area, vouching additions for the year. The audit program indicated that a sample of all items over $10,000 should be selected, plus a non-statistical sample of smaller items. When Barbara went to take the sample, Jack Bean, the senior, had left the client’s office and could not answer her questions about the appropriate size of the judgmental sample. Barbara forged ahead and selected 50 smaller items on her own judgment. Her basis for doing this was that there were about 250 such items, so 50 was a reasonably good proportion of such additions. Barbara audited the additions with the following results: The items over $10,000 contained no errors; however, the 50 small items contained a large number of errors. In fact, when Barbara projected them to all such additions, the amount seemed quite significant.
A couple of days later, Jack Bean returned to the client’s office. Barbara brought her work to Jack in order to inform him of the problems she found, and got the following response: “My God, Barbara, why did you do this? You were supposed to look only at the items over $10,000, plus 5 or 10 little ones. You’ve wasted a whole day on that work, and we can’t afford to spend any more time on it. I want you to throw away the schedules where you tested the last 40 small items and forget you ever did them.”
When Barbara asked about the possible audit adjustment regarding the small items, none of which arose from the first 10 items, Jack responded, “Don’t worry, it’s not material anyway. You just forget it; it’s my concern, not yours.”

REQUIRED
a. In what way is this an ethical dilemma for Barbara?
b. Lise the five-step Giving Voice to Values approach discussed in the chapter to resolve the ethical dilemma.