Bruce Albea contracting, Inc., was the general contractor on a state highway project. Albea subcontracted the asphalt work to APAC-Southeast, Inc. Their contact prohibited any delegation without Albea’s consent. In migproject, APAC delegated its duties to Mattews contracting co. although albea allowed mattews to finish the work, albea did not pay APAC for its work on the project. Albea argued that APAC had violated the antidelegation clause, rendering their contact void. Is albea correct? Explain.