Question: Consider the following hypothetical scenario for Royal Dutch Shell (Shell), a Netherlands-based oil and gas firm. One of Shells oil rig platforms collapsed, creating damage
a. Engineers who have examined the damaged site believe that much of the damage will naturally resolve itself, leading them to conclude that there is a 90% chance that damages are zero. They further estimate there is a 10% chance that the forces of nature will not resolve the damages, which will require additional intervention at a cost of $10 million.
b. Upon further analysis, the engineers in part a have revised their assessments. They now believe there is a 51% chance that damages will be $5 million, and a 49% chance that damages will be zero.
c. Environmentalists who have examined the damaged site believe that the damage is extensive and requires immediate cleanup, with the following range of damage estimates: $25 million (probability 20%); $300 million (probability 35%); and $4,000 million (probability 45%).
d. Upon further analysis, the environmentalists in part c have revised their assessments.
They now believe there is an 85% chance that damages will be $5,000 million and a 15% chance that they will be zero.
Step by Step Solution
3.45 Rating (174 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Under both US GAAP and IFRS the recognition of a loss contingency requires that a loss be probable Although US GAAP does not define probable a rule of ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
282-B-A-G-F-A (1809).docx
120 KBs Word File
