Question: Daniel evaluates risky alternatives based on prospect theory. For positive values of X (up to $10,000), his valuation function is V(X) = 20,000X - X2.

Daniel evaluates risky alternatives based on prospect theory. For positive values of X (up to $10,000), his valuation function is V(X) = 20,000X - X2. For negative values of X (closer to zero than - $10,000), it's V(X) = 30,000X - 1.5X2. Daniel's probability weighting function is Z(P) = 0.1 - 0.8P. Do these functions fit the assumptions of prospect theory? Determine whether Daniel would take the following two gambles (where in each case the alternative is zero for sure):
(a) Win $21 with 50 percent probability; lose $25 with 50 percent probability;
(b) Win $20.98 with 10 percent probability, win $20.99 with 10 percent probability, win $21.00 with 10 percent probability, win $21.01 with 10 percent probability, win $21.02 with 10 percent probability, and lose $25 with 50 percent probability. Also calculate the expected gain or loss (in dollars) for each of these gambles. Is it reasonable for Daniel to treat them differently? Why or why not? What features of prospect theory causes him to treat them differently?

Step by Step Solution

3.40 Rating (175 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

These functions fit the assumptions of prospect theory Daniel would not take gamble a but would take ... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

847-B-E-D-S (2876).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Economics Questions!