Question: David Catrow is the manufacturing production supervisor for Faraday Motor Works (FMW), a company that manufactures electrical motors for industrial applications. Trying to explain why

David Catrow is the manufacturing production supervisor for Faraday Motor Works (FMW), a company that manufactures electrical motors for industrial applications. Trying to explain why he did not get the year-end bonus that he had expected, he told his wife, "This is the dumbest place I've ever worked. Last year the company set up this budget assuming it would sell 150,000 units. Well, it sold only 140,000. The company lost money and gave me a bonus for not using as much materials and labor as was called for in the budget. This year, the company has the same 150,000 units goal and it sells 160,000. The company's making all kinds of money. You'd think I'd get this big fat bonus. Instead, management tells me I used more materials and labor than was budgeted. They said the company would have made a lot more money if I'd stayed within my budget. I guess I gotta wait for another bad year before I get a bonus. Like I said, this is the dumbest place I've ever worked."
FMW's master budget and the actual results for the most recent year of operating activity follow:

David Catrow is the manufacturing production supervisor for Faraday Motor

Required
a. Did FMW increase unit sales by cutting prices or by using some other strategy?
b. Is Mr. Catrow correct in his conclusion that something is wrong with the company's performance evaluation process? If so, what do you suggest be done to improve the system?
c. Prepare a flexible budget and re compute the budget variances.
d. Explain what might have caused the fixed costs to be different from the amount budgeted.
e. Assume that the company's materials price variance was favorable and its materials usage variance was unfavorable. Explain why Mr. Catrow may not be responsible for these variances. Now, explain why he may have been responsible for the materials usage variance.
f. Assume the labor price variance is unfavorable. Was the labor usage variance favorable or unfavorable?
g. Is the fixed cost volume variance favorable or unfavorable? Explain the effect of this variance on the cost of each unit produced.

Number of units Sales revenue Master Budget Actual Results Varlances For U 160,000 $33,000,000 $35,520,000 $2,520,000 F 150,000 10,000 Variable manufacturing costs (4,800,000) (4,200,000) (2.100,000 (2.290,000) 190,000U (5.250.000)(5.450,000 200,000 U 16,650,000 Materials Labor Overhead 4,400,000) 2 200,000 U 001901,0 Variable selling, general, and admin.costs Contribution margin 8,080,000 1,430,000 F Fixed costs 7.830,000)(7.751,000) 79,000 F Manufacturing overhead Selling, general, and admin. costs(6,980,000) 7.015,00035,000 U Net income 1.840,000 3.314000 1474.000 F

Step by Step Solution

3.29 Rating (161 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

a The increase in sales volume was not achieved by lowering the sales price The budgeted sales price was 220 per unit ie 33000000 150000 units The act... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

1089-B-M-A-M-A(2011).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Managerial Accounting Questions!