Question: Edwards received unsolicited faxes from Direct Access in violation of the Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, which makes it illegal to send unsolicited faxes. Edwards,
Edwards received unsolicited faxes from Direct Access in violation of the Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, which makes it illegal to send unsolicited faxes. Edwards, a Nevada resident, sued Direct, not a Nevada resident, in state court in Nevada for damages allowed under the law. Direct contended that the suit could not be filed in state court because it concerned federal law, so Nevada courts did not have jurisdiction. Is that correct?
[Edwards v. Direct Access, 124 P.3d 1158 (Sup. Ct., Nev., 2005)]
[Edwards v. Direct Access, 124 P.3d 1158 (Sup. Ct., Nev., 2005)]
Step by Step Solution
★★★★★
3.42 Rating (177 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
The Nevada Supreme Court held that state courts had jurisdiction Th... View full answer
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
Document Format (1 attachment)
154-L-B-L-L-E (871).docx
120 KBs Word File
