Financial statements for the Procter & Gamble Co. are presented in Exhibit 9.15 in Chapter 9. If

Question:

Financial statements for the Procter & Gamble Co. are presented in Exhibit 9.15 in Chapter 9. If you worked Mini case 9.1, you will have reformulated the statements in preparation for financial statement analysis. If not, do so now.

Proceed to carry out a comprehensive profitability analysis for fiscal years 2006-2008 along the lines of this chapter. Figure 11.1 will guide you. If you have built there formulated statements into a spreadsheet, you might add this profitability analysis to the spreadsheet. The BYOAP guide on the book's Web site will help. You might also extend the analysis to subsequent years, as they become available, to track P&G's profitability and its drivers as the firm evolves.

Your analysis should have the following features:

A. Operating profitability should be distinguished from return on common equity. Apply the financing leverage equation to highlight the difference. How much leverage does P&G carry? Is the firm favorably leveraged?

B. Distinguish operating income from sales from other operating income. In some years, translation gains have a big effect on total operating income. Calculate return on net operating assets (RNOA) with total operating income and then only with operating income from sales.

C. Carryout an analysis of operating liability leverage. Footnotes to the firm's financial statements reveal that its short-term borrowing rate averaged 4.2 percent (before tax) for the years 2006-2008. The firm's combined federal, state, and local statutory tax rate is 38 percent.

D. Carry out a comprehensive analysis of profit margins and asset turnovers.

After making the various calculations, step back and ask what they all mean. Refer to the background on P&G in Mini case 9.1 before you begin your interpretation. As a benchmark, you might compare the measures you have calculated with those for General Mills in this chapter. As a packaged food products company, General Mills is not quite a comparable company but, like P&G, it is primarily a brand management operation.

Comment on the change in P&G's profitability from 2006 to 2007.

Now conduct some sensitivity analysis. Ask some "what-if" questions. What would be the effect on ROCE if operating profitability fell? What would be the effect on RNOA if profit margins changed? If asset turnovers changed? How might an increase in advertising expenditures affect profitability? If you have built the analysis into a spreadsheet, you will be able to answer these questions with the press of a button.

A final question: After excluding currency gains and other nonsales items from operating income, there turn on net operating assets is quite low. Why?


Financial Statements
Financial statements are the standardized formats to present the financial information related to a business or an organization for its users. Financial statements contain the historical information as well as current period’s financial...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: