Question: For the study regarding mean cadence (see Problem 1), two-way ANOVA was used. Recall that the two factors were walking device (none, standard walker, rolling

For the study regarding mean cadence (see Problem 1), two-way ANOVA was used. Recall that the two factors were walking device (none, standard walker, rolling walker) and dual task (being required to respond vocally to a signal or no dual task required). Results of two-way ANOVA showed that there was no evidence of interaction between the factors. However, according to the article, "The ANOVA conducted on the cadence data revealed a main effect of walking device." When the hypothesis regarding no difference in mean cadence according to which, if any, walking device was used, the sample F was 30.94, with d.f.N = 2 and d.f.D = 18. Further, the P-value for the result was reported to be less than 0.01. From this information, what is the conclusion regarding any difference in mean cadence according to the factor "walking device used"?

Step by Step Solution

3.48 Rating (168 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

Since the P value is less than 001 there is a signi... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

1310-B-C-A-E-T(1729).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Cost Accounting Questions!