Go to Case Analysis 4.3, -Thompson v. Holm. Read the excerpt, and answer the following questions.

(a) Issue: The focus in this case was on an allegation of the violation of which clause of the U.S. Constitution, and by what means?

(b) Rule of Law: What is required to establish that this clause has been violated?

(c) Applying the Rule of Law: How did the court determine whether the claim of a violation was supported in this case?

(d) Conclusion: What did the federal appellate court conclude with respect to the plaintiff's claim, and what did the court order as the next step in the case?

In Case 4.3:

College of Engineering and Technology of Ohio University announced in a press conference that it had found "rampant and flagrant plagiarism" in the theses of mechanical engineering graduate students. Faculty singled out for "ignoring their ethical responsibilities" included Jay Gunasekera, chair of the department. Gunasekera was prohibited from advising students. He -led a suit against Dennis Irwin, the dean of Russ College, for violating his due process rights. What does due process require in these circumstances? Why?