Halleck executed a promissory note payable to the order of Leopold. Halleck did not pay the note
Question:
Halleck executed a promissory note payable to the order of Leopold. Halleck did not pay the note when due, and Leopold brought suit on the note, producing it in court. Halleck admitted that he had signed the note but claimed plaintiff Leopold was required to prove that the note had been issued for consideration and that the plaintiff was in fact the holder. Are these elements of proof required as part of the case? [Leopold v Halleck, 436 NE2d 29 (Ill App)]
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Andersons Business Law and the Legal Environment
ISBN: 978-0324786668
21st Edition
Authors: David p. twomey, Marianne moody Jennings
Question Posted: