In February, Brady contracted to construct a house for Fulghum for $206,850. Brady began construction on March

Question:

In February, Brady contracted to construct a house for Fulghum for $206,850. Brady began construction on March 13. Neither during the negotiation of this contract nor when he began performance was Brady licensed as a general contractor as required by North Carolina law. Brady was awarded his builder's license on October 22, having passed the examination on his second attempt. At that time, he had completed two-thirds of the work on Fulghum's house. Fulghum paid Brady $204,000. Brady brought suit, seeking an additional $2,850 on the original contract and $29,000 for "additions and changes" Fulghum requested during construction. Is Fulghum liable to Brady? Explain
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  answer-question

Smith and Robersons Business Law

ISBN: 978-0538473637

16th edition

Authors: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts

Question Posted: