Question: In March 2004, White was stopped in her van when Berkenheuer, driving a Penske truck in the course of his job with Taylor Distributing Company
IT IS expressly agreed that this Release also refers to any and all (past, present and future) claims/benefits arising or that may arise from the March 15, 2004 accident. This release identified Amex and its agents in great detail, but made no mention of Berkenheuer, Taylor, and Penske. In a later lawsuit by White against Berkenheuer, Taylor, and Penske, the defendants claimed that they were third-party beneficiaries to this release and that they "stood in the shoes of the promisee (Amex)." Is this a good argument?
Step by Step Solution
3.49 Rating (156 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
No The defendants were not parties to the release but were claiming rights under i... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
310-L-B-L-C (1285).docx
120 KBs Word File
