In our discussion of TCP congestion control in Section 3.7, we implicitly assumed that the TCP sender

Question:

In our discussion of TCP congestion control in Section 3.7, we implicitly assumed that the TCP sender always had data to send. Consider now the case that the TCP sender sends a large amount of data and then goes idle (since it has no more data to send) at t1. TCP remains idle for a relatively long period of time and then wants to send more data at t2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having TCP use the cwnd and ssthresh values from tI when starting to send data at t2? What alternative would you recommend? Why?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Computer Networking A Top-Down Approach

ISBN: 978-0136079675

5th edition

Authors: James F. Kurose, Keith W. Ross

Question Posted: