Question: In Table, no liability and strict liability have the opposite incentive effects upon activity levels.Why? Efficiency of Incentives Created by Liability Rules* yes indicates efficient

In Table, no liability and strict liability have the opposite incentive effects upon activity levels.Why?
In Table, no liability and strict liability have the opposite

Efficiency of Incentives Created by Liability Rules* yes indicates efficient incentives; no, inefficient incentives; and zero, no incentive. Legal Rule Precaution Activity Level Victim njurer Victim Injurer No liability Strict liability Simple negligence Negligence contributory negligence Strict liability + contributory negligence Comparative negligence yes zero yes yes yes yes zero yes yes es es yes yes no es yes no yes no yes no no yes no assumes perfect compensation and legal standards equal to efficient precaution

Step by Step Solution

3.47 Rating (176 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

The argument in favor of strict liability when there are activitylevel effects is tha... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

153-L-B-L-T-C (130).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!