Question: In this problem we derive the direct matrix inversion algorithm for adjusting the weights of an adaptive antenna array. To do so, we revisit the
In this problem we derive the direct matrix inversion algorithm for adjusting the weights of an adaptive antenna array. To do so, we revisit the derivation of the Wiener filter presented.
(a) Show that Rxw = rxd where Rx is an estimate of the correlation matrix of the input vector x[k] and rxd is an estimate of the cross-cot-relation vector between x[k] and the reference signal d[k]:
The superscript H in the formula for Rx denotes Hermitian transportation (i.e., transposition and complex conjugation), so x[k]xH [k] denotes the outer product of x[k] with itself. The summations for both &, and i are performed over a total of k snapshots, with each snapshot being represented by the pair {x(k], d[k]).
(b) Using the formulas of part (a), describe an algorithm for computing the weight vector w, given a data set consisting of K snapshots. Hence demonstrate that the complexity of this algorithm grows as M with the size of the weight vector w denoted by M.
![.-xki*" k] K k=1 xdk] K xd](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/si.experts.images/questions/2022/11/636a49e32955c_115636a49e31b23c.jpg)
.-xki*" k] K k=1 xdk] K xd
Step by Step Solution
3.38 Rating (173 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a According to the Wiener filter derived for the case of complex data the optimum weight vector is d... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
19-E-T-E-C-S (117).docx
120 KBs Word File
