Justify the rule of universal modus tollens by showing that the premises x(P(x) Q(x)) and Q(a)

Question:

Justify the rule of universal modus tollens by showing that the premises ∀x(P(x) → Q(x)) and ¬Q(a) for a particular element a in the domain, imply ¬P(a).
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: