Question: Length is not very important in evaluating the quality of corks because it has little to do with the effectiveness of a cork in preserving
a. Does the preceding sample give sufficient reason to show that the mean length is different from 45.0 mm, at the 0.02 level of significance? A different random sample of 18 corks is taken from the same batch.
b. Does the preceding sample give sufficient reason to show that the mean length is different from 45.0 mm, at the 0.02 level of significance?
c. What effect did the two different sample means have on the calculated test statistic in parts a and b? Explain.
d. What effect did the two different sample sizes have on the calculated test statistic in parts a and b? Explain.
e. What effect did the two different sample standard deviations have on the calculated test statistic in parts a and b? Explain.
44.95 44.80 44.93 45.22 442 45.12 44.62 5.1744.60 44.60 44.75 45.17 45.02 45.30 45.14 45.35 45.50 45.26 44.88 4471 44.07 45.10 45.01 44.83 45.13 44.69 44.89 45.15 45.13
Step by Step Solution
3.34 Rating (175 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a Step 1 a The mean length of corks in a shipment b H o 450 H a 450 Step 2 a normality indicated b t ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
519-M-S-S-I (2467).docx
120 KBs Word File
