Question: Plaintiff, while a spectator at a professional hockey game, is struck in the face by a puck. The defendant shot the puck attempting to score
Plaintiff, while a spectator at a professional hockey game, is struck in the face by a puck. The defendant shot the puck attempting to score a goal, but shot too high, causing the puck to go into the spectator area. Plaintiff brings suit, and defendant claims assumption of risk. Who prevails? Suppose the defendant had been angry at crowd reaction and intentionally shot the puck into the crowd.
Would the outcome change?
Step by Step Solution
★★★★★
3.32 Rating (155 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
a The defendants defense of assumption of risk is ... View full answer
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
Document Format (1 attachment)
179-L-B-L-L-E (1569).docx
120 KBs Word File
