Plaintiff Wolfe worked for defendant company Tobacco Express II, Inc. After Wolfe had worked for the defendant company for some time, the defendant claimed that cash and inventory were missing. The company then required Wolfe and other employees to take a polygraph test. Wolfe refused. Plaintiff alleged that he then reported back to work, where he was terminated. Applying the Employee Polygraph Protection Act, Wolfe brought a claim against the defendant company. The defendant company brought counterclaims against Wolfe for conversion of merchandise. How do you think the court ruled? Why? Wolfe v. Tobacco Express II, Inc., 26 F. Supp. 3d 560 (2014).