Question: Plaintiffs leased commercial space from the defendant to open a florist shop. After the lease was executed, the plaintiffs learned that they could not place

Plaintiffs leased commercial space from the defendant to open a florist shop. After the lease was executed, the plaintiffs learned that they could not place a freestanding sign along the highway to advertise their business because the Deschutes County Code allowed only one freestanding sign on the property, and the defendant already had one in place. The plaintiffs filed this action, alleging that defendant had breached the lease by failing to provide them with space in which they could erect a freestanding sign. Paragraph 16 of the lease provides as follows: ‘‘Tenant shall not erect or install any signs visible from outside the leased premises with out [sic] the previous written consent of the Landlord.’’ Explain whether this evidence is admissible.

Step by Step Solution

3.48 Rating (168 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

Yes the evidence is admissible The parol evidence rule is a rule of integration It prohibits oral ev... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

110-L-B-L-C (426).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!