Question: Prove Theorem 2.2.2 on page 71. The only if direction is direct from the definition of independence on page 68. For the if direction, use

Prove Theorem 2.2.2 on page 71. The €œonly if€ direction is direct from the definition of independence on page 68. For the €œif€ direction, use induction on the value of j in the definition of independence. Let m = j ˆ’ 1 and let = 1 with j1 = ij.
In Theorem 2.2.2
Let A1, . . . , Ak be events such that Pr(A1 ˆ© . . . ˆ© Ak) > 0. Then A1, . . . , Ak are independent if and only if, for every two disjoint subsets {i1, . . . , im} and {j1, . . . , je} of {1, . . . , k}, we have
Pr(A;, n..NAIA,n..nA) = Pr(A, n.n A).

Theorem 2.2.2 says that k events are independent if and only if learning that some of the events occur does not change the probability that any combination of the other events occurs.

Pr(A;, n..NAIA,n..nA) = Pr(A, n.n A).

Step by Step Solution

3.40 Rating (181 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

For the only if direction we need to prove that if A 1 A k are independent then For all disjoint sub... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

602-M-S-P (5192).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Statistics Questions!