Question: Rationalization for fraud can fall under two categories: no harm and no responsibility. Assume an employee is directed by management to reduce recorded expenses at

Rationalization for fraud can fall under two categories: “no harm” and “no responsibility.” Assume an employee is directed by management to reduce recorded expenses at year-end by insignificant amounts individually, but which are material in total. How might the employee justify her actions if questioned by the auditor with respect to no harm and no responsibility? What stage of moral development in Kohlberg’s model is best illustrated by the employee’s actions? Why?

Step by Step Solution

3.44 Rating (160 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

The employee is not embezzling or benefiting from this fraud it is more of a management fraud of the ... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

376-B-O-B-B-E (893).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Organizational Behavior Questions!