Salomon v. Salomon stands for the proposition that the corporation has a separate existence from its shareholders.

Question:

Salomon v. Salomon stands for the proposition that the corporation has a separate existence from its shareholders. This means that creditors of a corporation do not have recourse against the shareholders’ assets. Is this fair? Is it fair that creditors of a sole proprietorship can go after the sole proprietor’s personal assets? What is the justification for the difference in treatment?
Corporation
A Corporation is a legal form of business that is separate from its owner. In other words, a corporation is a business or organization formed by a group of people, and its right and liabilities separate from those of the individuals involved. It may...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Canadian Business & the Law

ISBN: 978-0176501624

4th edition

Authors: Dorothy DuPlessis, Shannnon o'Byrne, Steven Enman, Sally Gunz

Question Posted: