Question: Samuels (1996) collected data to examine how well students do in follow-up courses if the prerequisite course is taught by a part-time or full-time instructor.

Samuels (1996) collected data to examine how well students do in follow-up courses if the prerequisite course is taught by a part-time or full-time instructor. The following table gives results for students in Math I and Math II.
Samuels (1996) collected data to examine how well students do

a. The null hypothesis here is that the proportion of students receiving an A, B, or C is the same for each of the four combinations of instructor type. Is this a test of independence, homogeneity, or goodness of fit?
b. Perform a hypothesis test for the null hypothesis in (a), assuming students are independent.
c. Do you think the assumption that students are independent is valid? Explain.

Instructor Instructor Grade in Math II for MathI for MathA, B, or C D, F, or Withdraw Total 461 Full Time Full Time Part Time Part Time Full Time Part Time Full Time Part Time 797 311 570 181 449 1571 1258 492 1050 1358 Total 2587 4158

Step by Step Solution

3.58 Rating (159 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

a This is a test of independence A sample of students is taken and each student classified based ... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

627-M-S-S-D (2536).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Statistics Questions!