Question: Stephans Machine & Tool, Inc., purchased a boring mill from D&H Machinery Consultants. The mill was a specialized type of equipment and was essential to

Stephan’s Machine & Tool, Inc., purchased a boring mill from D&H Machinery Consultants. The mill was a specialized type of equipment and was essential to the operation of Stephan’s plant. The purchase price was $96,000, and Stephan’s had to borrow this amount from a bank to finance the sale. The loan exhausted Stephan’s borrowing capacity. The mill was unfit, and D&H agreed to replace it with another one. D&H did not keep its promise, and Stephan’s sued it for specific performance of the contract as modified by the replacement agreement. Is specific performance an appropriate remedy? Discuss. [Stephan’s Machine & Tool, Inc. v D&H Machinery Consultants, Inc., 417 NE2d 579 (Ohio App)]

Step by Step Solution

3.28 Rating (174 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

The court will grant specific performance in this c... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

131-L-B-L-S (206).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!