In the opening scenario, the bank demanded $5000 from poor Sam for his Jeep that had been
Question:
In the opening scenario, the bank demanded $5000 from poor Sam for his Jeep that had been repossessed and sold to someone else. As we have seen, Article 9 gives the bank the right to demand this payment. But is that fair? Should Article 9 change, so that a person like Sam does not have to pay? Or is the law reasonable now?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Business Law and the Legal Environment
ISBN: 978-1133587491
5th edition
Authors: Jeffrey F. Beatty, Susan S. Samuelson
Question Posted: