In July 2006, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 25, filed two petitions and held an

Question:

In July 2006, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 25, filed two petitions and held an election for a collective bargaining representative at two FedEx locations. However, FedEx refused to bargain with the union. FedEx did not contest the vote count of the election;
instead, FedEx refused to collectively bargain because it believed that its single-route drivers were not “employees” but, rather, “independent contractors,” and the rules of collective bargaining in this situation apply only to employees. However, the National Labor Relations Board concluded that FedEx committed an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain with the union certified as the collective bargaining representative of the drivers. FedEx sought judicial review of the decision of the board, and the board cross-applied for enforcement of its order requiring that the company bargain.
1. Do you agree with the National Labor Relations Board’s ruling that FedEx engaged in an unfair labor practice? Why?
2. What duties and rights would the FedEx drivers have if they were considered employees? How would their duties and rights differ if the drivers were considered independent contractors of the company?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Dynamic Business Law

ISBN: 9781260733976

6th Edition

Authors: Nancy Kubasek, M. Neil Browne, Daniel Herron, Lucien Dhooge, Linda Barkacs

Question Posted: