Sushi Yo! makes ready-to-eat Asian seafood dishes that are sold in grocery stores. Sushi Yo! and Dragonfly Tea Company comarket their products in Milwaukee. Due to their success, the two firms negotiate a new comarketing agreement for Chicago. Sushi Yo! e-mails a proposed multiyear contract to Dragonfly, but Dragonfly does not sign it or respond.

Is this deal enforceable against Dragonfly? No. Under the Statute of Frauds, a contract that cannot, by its own terms, be performed within one ______________ from the day after the contract is formed must be in writing to be enforceable. Because Sushi Yo!’s proposed contract could not be performed within a ______________, it was not enforceable without a writing ______________ by Dragonfly. Because Dragonfly did not ______________ the proposal, it was not enforceable.