Question: 11. In the previous problem, replace the third-stage prior given above with b1 G(c1, d1), b2 G(c2, d2), b1 and b2 independent, thus

11. In the previous problem, replace the third-stage prior given above with b1 ∼ G(c1, d1), b2 ∼ G(c2, d2), b1 and b2 independent, thus destroying the conjugacy for these two complete conditionals. Resort to rejection or Metropolis-Hastings subsampling for these two components instead, choosing appropriate values for c1, c2, d1, and d2. What is the effect on the posterior for b1 and b2? For R? For k?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Categorical Data Analysis Questions!