1. What differences do you find between procedure at common law and procedure in equity as it is described by Bowen? What are the differences in pleading, the manner of receiving evidence, the attitude toward singleness of issue, and the determination of questions of fact?

The rules of evidence, which are chiefly concerned with the exclusion of testimony of doubtful value, were developed in the common-law courts and were never strictly applied in equity.

How is this fact related to the differences in equity and common-law procedures?