As the text notes, some states continue to use the Frye test for the admissibility of expert scientific evidence. Florida is one of those states. In Sybers v. State [841 So.2d 532 (Fla.
App. 2003)], a Florida court held that the state’s expert should not have been permit¬
ted to testify, based on the Frye test. What was the problem with the expert’s testi¬
mony? Would a different result have been reached under the Daubert test?