Question: Parallel indices: a. Secondary indices in a centralized database store the record identifier. A global secondary index too could potentially store a partition number holding
Parallel indices:
a. Secondary indices in a centralized database store the record identifier. A global secondary index too could potentially store a partition number holding the record, and a record identifier within the partition. Why would this be a bad idea?
b. Global secondary indices are implemented in a way similar to local secondary indices that are used when records are stored in a B+-tree file organization. Explain the similarities between the two scenarios that result in a similar implementation of the secondary indices.
Step by Step Solution
3.45 Rating (164 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a If a global secondary index stored a partition number and a record identifier it would be di... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
