Poor Sarah Jane not only had a short-lived marriage but found out that her supposedly $45,000 ring

Question:

Poor Sarah Jane not only had a short-lived marriage but found out that her supposedly $45,000 ring was worth only half that amount. It seems that the jeweler had misrepresented it to her now ex-husband. Sarah Jane now brings an action against the jeweler for breach of an express warranty. Can she sue even though she was not the purchaser or, in fact, any purchaser?
[Schaurer v. Mandarin Gems of California, Inc., 125 Cal. Rptr. 4th 949 (2005).]

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Dynamic Business Law The Essentials

ISBN: 978-1259917103

4th edition

Authors: Nancy Kubasek, Neil Browne, Daniel Herron

Question Posted: