The two companies had an agreement by which Sunrish was providing a food product to Nutrisoya. However, Sunrich allegedly did not deliver the products covered in the contract, and Nutrisoya took the company to court for material breach of contract. The seller wanted the district court to instruct the jury on the difference between a breach of a single installment and a breach of an entire installment contract, arguing that a single installment breach did not disregard the value of the whole contract. However, the district court did not give such an instruction and left the defendant to argue the point. How do you think the jury decided? [Nutrisoya v. Sunrich 641 F.3d 282; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 11561.]