Two female employees of a 24-hour residential facility for abused and neglected children discovered video recording equipment hidden on a bookshelf in an office that they shared. They were able to lock the door and close the blinds to the office; and one of the women regularly changed clothes there. The California Supreme Court upheld the placement of the hidden video equipment by their employer, even though neither woman was suspected of any wrongdoing. How is that possible? Under what set of facts do you imagine that an employer could permissibly monitor employees who are not suspected of wrongdoing?