Consider the case of instant runoff voting when three or more social choices are involved. Each voter
Question:
Consider the case of instant runoff voting when three or more social choices are involved. Each voter has one vote and votes for his or her favorite option. The option with the least votes is eliminated, and the process continues until there are two choices and the one with the majority wins. Suppose we have five voters and three societal alternatives (A, B, C). Two of the voters rank the alternatives, from first choice to last choice, (A,B,C); two of the voters rank them (C,B,A); one voter ranks them \((B, A, C)\). Show that the instant runoff method violates the independence of irrelevant alternatives axiom (A6).
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
To demonstrate how the instant runoff method violates the independence of irrelevant alternatives ax...View the full answer
Answered By
Rinki Devi
Professional, Experienced, and Expert tutor who will provide speedy and to-the-point solutions.
Hi there! Are you looking for a committed, reliable, and enthusiastic tutor? Well, teaching and learning are more of a second nature to me, having been raised by parents who are both teachers. I have done plenty of studying and lots of learning on many exciting and challenging topics. All these experiences have influenced my decision to take on the teaching role in various capacities. As a tutor, I am looking forward to getting to understand your needs and helping you achieve your academic goals. I'm highly flexible and contactable. I am available to work on short notice since I only prefer to work with very small and select groups of students.
I have been teaching students for 5 years now in different subjects and it's truly been one of the most rewarding experiences of my life. I have also done one-to-one tutoring with 100+ students and helped them achieve great subject knowledge.
2+ Reviews
10+ Question Solved
Related Book For 
Question Posted:
