Question: An employee with only a month or two on the job became confused about how to conduct a particular transaction. To mollify a customer who

An employee with only a month or two on the job became confused about how to conduct a particular transaction. To mollify a customer who had become irate, the employee gave the customer an unauthorized ten percent discount. This came to the attention of a store security manager who asked the employee to accompany him to an interview room. In the presence of two other store personnel, an hour-long interrogation ensued.


1.) What were the legal issues in this case? What did the court decide?

2.) What was the basis of her privacy tort claim? Her infliction of emotional distress claim? Why were they rejected?

3.) What was the basis of her false imprisonment claim? Her defamation claim? Why was she allowed to go to trial on them? Is she likely to prevail at trial?

4.) What, if anything, should this employer do differently? 

Step by Step Solution

3.39 Rating (165 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 The employee brought claims for public disclosure of private facts false imprisonment defamation and infliction of emotional distress The trial courts decision to grant summary judgment was upheld f... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Human Resource Management Questions!