Lewis, an undercover police officer carrying a concealed pistol, went shopping in a Dayton Hudson department store. There, a security officer became suspicious that he was a shoplifter. Lewis took some clothing into a fitting room, where there were signs stating, “This area is under surveillance by Hudson’s personnel.” In fact, the security guard observed Lewis from a grille in the ceiling. After he saw Lewis place the gun on a chair, he called the police. Eventually, Lewis was identified as an undercover officer. But he sued Dayton Hudson claiming that the spying in the fitting room was an invasion of his privacy. Will he recover? (Lewis v. Dayton Hudson Corporation, 128 Mich. App. 165)