This exercise involves triads. Each triad counts off into threes: 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, and so on. In the first round, all the 1s in their respective triads take the pro position (see the topics given later in the exercise), all the 2s take the con position, and all the 3s act as observers. After a topic is given, two individuals representing opposing viewpoints have one minute to collect their thoughts and then five to seven minutes to arrive at a mutually agreeable position on that topic.

The observer should use the Listening Feedback Form to capture actual examples of what the individuals said or did that indicated active and less-than-active listening.

When time is called, the pro individuals share their opinion of which listening behaviors they performed well and which ones they’d like to improve. Then the con individuals do the same. Finally, the observers share their observations and insights, using examples to reinforce their feedback.

If additional rounds are used, rotate the roles so that each person plays a speaking role and, if possible, an observing role.

Potential topics to be used:
1. Gun control 

2. Capital punishment 

3. Race as a criterion for college admission 

4. Prison reform 

5. U.S. intervention in wars outside the United States 

6. Legalization of marijuana 

7. Mandatory armed forces draft 

8. Interracial adoption 

9. Premarital and extramarital sex 

10. Prayer in schools 

11. Diversity in the workplace 

12. Pornography on the Internet

QUESTIONS

1. Did you arrive at a mutually agreeable solution? What helped you get there?
2. What were some factors that hindered this process?
3. How comfortable did you feel arguing the position you were given? How did this influence your ability to listen actively?
4. If the position you were given was exactly opposite your values or beliefs, do you see this topic differently now than before the exercise?
5. What steps can you take to improve your ability to listen actively to friends or associates, especially when you don’t agree with their viewpoint?

Transcribed Image Text:

Round 1: Topic selected: Notes: Listening Feedback Form Indicators of Active Listening 1. Asked questions for clarification 2. Paraphrased the opposing view Round 2: Topic selected: Notes: 3. Responded to nonverbal cues (e.g., body posture, tone of voice) 4. Appeared to move toward a mutually satisfying solution Indicators of Less-Than-Active Listening 5. Interrupted before allowing the other person to finish 6. Was defensive about her or his position 7. Appeared to dominate the conversation 8. Ignored nonverbal cue Pro Con