Question: 1. Why has the company used both net present value and internal rate of return, but ignored the payback, when undertaking the prefeasibility study? 2.
1. Why has the company used both net present value and internal rate of return, but ignored the payback, when undertaking the prefeasibility study?
2. What steps can the company take to ensure that there is less likelihood that incorrect estimates will result in the project not having an acceptable net present value and internal rate of return?
Step by Step Solution
3.49 Rating (166 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 The payback method of evaluation does not incorporate cash flows after the payback period Given th... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (2 attachments)
1519_605d88e1771b4_676365.pdf
180 KBs PDF File
1519_605d88e1771b4_676365.docx
120 KBs Word File
