The education grant simulation case showed that a program of matching grants was not effective in equalizing

Question:

The education grant simulation case showed that a program of matching grants was not effective in equalizing per pupil spending because demand was relatively inelastic. What other means might be used to narrow these spending differences? Outline the specifics of a state program that you believe would be successful in setting a minimum per pupil spending level of $10,000. Explain the effect of that program on each district, and discuss whether you would support such a change in your state.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  answer-question
Question Posted: