From your reading of selections from Plato, the Buddha, the Bible, Laozi, and Confucius, and your reading about these and other writers, “what is the ideal life of a person?” how would their answers differ? What points of similarity might they enjoy? What differences strike you as most interesting? What points of contact strike you as most surprising? Can the positions be reconciled? if we got representatives of the various schools of thought together—if we gathered up Socrates, Confucius, the Buddha, Laozi, and Moses and locked them up together—could they negotiate a compromise, a universal system of thought on which they could all agree?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The ideal life of a person describes that a person is a true lover of knowledge and that not to love money To be earnest and be kind to the human bein... View the full answer