Write an essay in which you refute Paglia’s argument about the drinking age, contending that the drinking age should remain twenty-one years of age, providing substantive information as to why the drinking age should not change. Rebut at least two of Paglia’s points in your response.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The Drinking Age is not past its Prime Introduction The fact that the drinking age is past its prime is refutable This means that it should not be changed from its current position to a new one In fac... View the full answer