1 (1 point) Saved When interpreting words in a statute, the starting point is: Question 1 options: a) The ordinary or plain meaning b) The constitutional meaning c) The disputed meaning d) The technical meaning Question 2 (1 point) Saved When there is a discrepancy between the English and French versions of a federal statute, the courts will look for: Question 2 options: a) The translated meaning b) The shared meaning c) The presumed meaning d) The reasonable meaning Question 3 (1 point) Saved In the Harvard mouse case, the Supreme Court favoured a static interpretation of the word "invention" because: Question 3 options: a) Mice are not inventions b) The statute was ambiguous c) Parliament could not have contemplated the patenting of higher life forms d) Harvard did not invent the mouse Question 4 (1 point) Saved In applying the various rules of statutory interpretation, courts strive to arrive at: Question 4 options: a) An objective meaning b) A plausible meaning c) A common sense meaning d) A dictionary meaning Question 5 (2 points) Saved Select all that apply. The modern principle of statutory interpretation emphasizes: Question 5 options: a) The entire context b) How a reasonable person would interpret the law c) The grammatical and ordinary sense of words d) The intention of Parliament Question 6 (1 point) Saved Select all that apply. A statute applying to the "sun