$1)$ A recent MIT Technology Review article titled $"10$ Breakthrough Technologies $2024"$ features several cutting$-$edge technologies and presents them in a way that epitomizes technological determinism. According to the MIT Technology Review, this article highlights innovations like Apple Vision Pro, highly efficient solar cells, and generative AI$,$ all of which have the potential to dramatically impact and better our future and cause societal change on their own. $10$ Breakthrough Technologies $2024|$ MIT Technology ReviewThis article claims that these technologies will unavoidably result in significant changes to several facets of life. It highlights how the widespread use of AI is changing societal norms and industries, implying that technology drives change apart from human agency and cultural influences $($MIT Technology Review$)\mathrm{.}2)$ The arguments made in the MIT Technology Review article can be reinterpreted according to the theory of Social Construction of Technology $($SCOT$)$ to emphasize how human choices, societal pressures, and the wider environment shape technological advances and implementation.Artificial Intelligence for Everything: The SCOT standpoint would emphasize the social circumstances and human decisions that drive AI development, as opposed to seeing AI as a self$-$sufficient force reinventing the tech industry. This includes the financial interests of businesses such as Microsoft, Google, and Meta as well as the regulatory frameworks that shape the application of AI and the cultural aspects that affect its acceptance and assimilation into everyday activities.Super$-$efficient Solar Cells: SCOT would place more emphasis on ecological regulations, market forces, and grassroots movements that support renewable energy sources as the driving forces behind research and investment in this field, rather than viewing the efficiency gains in solar cells as a logical byproduct of developments in technology.Apple Vision Pro: The launch of Apple Vision Pro can be attributed to several factors, including technological advancements, consumer preferences for fully immersive entertainment, and pressure from the tech industry's competitors.$$By embracing the SCOT viewpoint, we acknowledge that a wide range of societal, political, and economic variables influence the development of innovations rather than them developing in a vacuum. With this method, the story is shifted from electronic devices as an independent force for change to a more complex view of technology as a byproduct of social settings and human behavior $($Wavell Room$).$ This new interpretation emphasizes the significance of recognizing the intricate interactions that exist between technology and society, emphasizing how social structures and people's choices shape advancement in technology and its effects.