1- A researcher has just finished designing and validating a scale meant to measure "employee high-performance potential", which he hopes to monetize and market to organizations. The scale is a 30-item questionnaire that measures "the ability of respondents to demonstrate agile thinking and critical insight when faced with complex organizational challenges". As the senior leadership team being pitched this idea, your group must vet the researcher's work and decide if it's worth investing in.

requirements

: 1) Identify a potential contaminating variable, and how you would assess discriminant validity. 2) Identify a relevant outcome, and how you would assess criterion validity. 2- Imagine you are a consultant who has been hired to help your client deal with a recent drop in performance and an increase in employee errors.Your client suspects that there might be an issue with how well employees work as part of a team; but they don't know how to confirm that. You need to study "team effectiveness" in this organization. But how do you do that?!To answer this question: 1) Choose whether you would use interviewing OR use observation for this study. 2) Discuss what the study would look like. 3) Explain why you think this is the best approach1-