$1)$ Cherie Pye worked as a wedding cake designer for Royal Bakery for five years. Last week, her boss told her that Royal was discontinuing its line of wedding cakes and would be only be producing low fat muffins beginning next month. Pye was told that she could stay on if she wished but that her new job would be measuring out the whole wheat flour needed for each batch of muffins. This job would be at the same rate of pay as she got as a cake designer. Pye refused saying that she would only work as a cake designer. Her boss then told her to come to the office where he paid her salary in full until the end of the month and then told her that her services were no longer needed and that her employment at Royal Bakery was finished.

The next day, Cherie was hired by Victoria Bakery. A term of Cherie$$s employment contract with Royal prohibited her from working at any other bakery for five years. She had completely forgotten about this term. Cherie sued Royal for wrongful dismissal.

$2)$ Royal then discovered that Cherie had a website where she sold $$special occasion$$ cakes. The sample cakes pictured on her website were identical to the designs Cherie had produced for Royal. Royal is unhappy

$3)$ Part A $$ Explain the legal position and legal arguments that Cherie Pye has against Royal Bakery.

$4)$ Part B $$ Explain the legal position and legal arguments that Royal Bakery has against Cherie Pye.